Worldcoin is a new cryptocurrency that Sam Altman, the former CEO of OpenAI, has developed. The coin is based on a biometric identification system, meaning users must scan their irises to create an account. This has raised serious privacy concerns, as some people worry that their biometric data could be used for tracking or surveillance.
The collection of biometric data is a dangerous thing for society and the world. Biometric data is unique to each individual and can be used to track, identify, and target people. This could lead to some serious problems, including:
- Government surveillance: Governments could use biometric data to track and monitor their citizens. This could lead to a loss of privacy and freedom. For example, a government could use biometric data to track protesters or to identify people who are critical of the government.
- Identity theft: Biometric data could be used to steal someone’s identity. This could lead to financial fraud, credit card fraud, and other forms of harm. For example, a criminal could use someone’s iris scan to open a bank account in their name or to apply for a loan.
- Discrimination: Biometric data could be used to discriminate against people. For example, an employer could use biometric data to screen job applicants, or a bank could use biometric data to deny someone a loan. For example, a company could use biometric data to deny someone a job because of their race, religion, or political views.
In addition to these privacy concerns, there are also concerns about the fairness of Worldcoin’s distribution system. The company said it will distribute 20% of the coins to early adopters, including its employees and investors.
Reading an older article? Use the brief to stay current.
This Article Gives You the Background. The Brief Gives You What Changed Next.
Get the weekday cyber brief for new policy moves, CISA actions, and risk developments this article could not cover when it was published.
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Free. Weekday mornings. 5 minutes or less.
The dangers of Worldcoin are real and should not be taken lightly. People who are concerned about their privacy should avoid using this cryptocurrency.
Here are some additional research findings about the dangers of Worldcoin:
- A study by the Electronic Frontier Foundation found that biometric data is more vulnerable to hacking than other types of personal data.
- A report by the World Economic Forum found that biometric data could be used to create a “digital panopticon,” in which people are constantly monitored and tracked.
- A study by the University of California, Berkeley found that biometric data could be used to discriminate against people based on their race, religion, and sexual orientation.
The dangers of Worldcoin are not just theoretical. There are already reports of people being harmed by the use of biometric data. For example, in 2019, a man in India was denied a loan because the bank’s biometric identification system rejected his iris scan.
The future of Worldcoin is uncertain. The company still needs to release a detailed privacy policy, and it is unclear how the biometric data will be used. However, the potential dangers of Worldcoin are real, and people should be aware of them before deciding whether or not to participate.
Reading an older article? Use the brief to stay current.
This Article Gives You the Background. The Brief Gives You What Changed Next.
Get the weekday cyber brief for the developments, risk shifts, and new signals that changed the picture after this article was published.
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Free. Weekday mornings. 5 minutes or less.
If you are concerned about your privacy, you should avoid using Worldcoin. Invest in Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies that do not require biometric data. You should also be careful about using your biometric data in other contexts. For example, you should be cautious about what biometric data you share with companies and organizations.
The future of privacy is at stake. We need to be careful about how we use biometric data. If we are not careful, we could lose our privacy and freedom.
Newer CyberExperts coverage on this topic
This article still works as background. If you want the current picture, start with the freshest related coverage below and today's brief.
6 Solutions for Setting AI Agent Guardrails at Scale
Agents don't just answer questions—they take actions. Compare six platforms that set guardrails on identity, intent, tools, and consequence at runtime.
One phished login could read any inbox on on-prem Exchange — install the reissued update
Any logged-in user can open other mailboxes on on-prem Exchange until the October 2 update is installed. September’s original update does not...
Rejetto file servers are being probed — upgrade HFS before the scans turn into break-ins
A public exploit forges an HFS admin login with no password. Scanning started October 1. Move to 3.3.4, or take it off...
Wednesday’s brief: Atlassian Data Center, then Struts, Smarty’s cache, Osaka’s outage
The fastest way to catch up on what changed after this article was published.
Start your morning with the signal that matters.
Get the biggest cybersecurity developments, why they matter, and where to go deeper on CyberExperts.
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Free. Weekdays. Built for operators.