State-sponsored hacking groups are teams of hackers who are sponsored, directly or indirectly, by a government or other organization with the resources and motivation to carry out complex and sophisticated attacks. These groups often operate in secrecy and may have access to advanced tools and techniques that are unavailable to other hackers.
State-sponsored hacking groups have been active for decades, and their activities have been documented in numerous cases around the world. Some well-known examples include:
APT1
APT1 (Advanced Persistent Threat 1) is a group of hackers that was believed to be sponsored by the Chinese government. APT1 was first identified by cybersecurity firm Mandiant in 2013 and was linked to a number of high-profile data breaches, including the breach of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management in 2015.
Reading an older article? Use the brief to stay current.
This Article Gives You the Background. The Brief Gives You What Changed Next.
Get the weekday cyber brief for new policy moves, CISA actions, and risk developments this article could not cover when it was published.
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Free. Weekday mornings. 5 minutes or less.
Equation Group
The Equation Group is a group of hackers that was believed to be sponsored by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA). The group was first identified by the Russian cybersecurity firm Kaspersky Lab in 2015. It was linked to a number of highly sophisticated attacks, including the use of a powerful malware called “EquationDrug.”
APT28
APT28 (Advanced Persistent Threat 28) is a group of hackers that was believed to be sponsored by the Russian government. APT28 was first identified by cybersecurity firm FireEye in 2014 and has been linked to a number of high-profile attacks, including the 2016 breach of the Democratic National Committee.
Lazarus Group
The Lazarus Group is a group of hackers that was believed to be sponsored by the North Korean government. The group was first identified by cybersecurity firm Kaspersky Lab in 2014 and has been linked to a number of high-profile attacks, including the 2014 attack on Sony Pictures and the 2017 WannaCry ransomware attack.
State-sponsored hacking groups often have specific goals and motivations for their attacks. These can include gathering intelligence, stealing sensitive data, or disrupting the operations of other countries or organizations. In some cases, state-sponsored groups may also be involved in cyber espionage, seeking to gather information about other countries military, political, or economic activities.
Reading an older article? Use the brief to stay current.
This Article Gives You the Background. The Brief Gives You What Changed Next.
Get the weekday cyber brief for the developments, risk shifts, and new signals that changed the picture after this article was published.
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Free. Weekday mornings. 5 minutes or less.
One of the key challenges in dealing with state-sponsored hacking groups is the difficulty in attributing attacks to specific groups or countries. Hackers often use various techniques to cover their tracks and make it difficult to trace the origin of an attack. In addition, governments may have incentives to deny involvement in cyberattacks, even when evidence points to their involvement.
To protect against state-sponsored hacking attacks, individuals and organizations can implement strong security measures, such as firewalls and encryption, and train employees to recognize and avoid phishing attacks and other common tactics. It is also crucial for governments and international organizations to work together to address the problem of state-sponsored hacking and to establish norms and rules for responsible behavior in cyberspace.
Newer CyberExperts coverage on this topic
This article still works as background. If you want the current picture, start with the freshest related coverage below and today's brief.
Who Should Pay for GSEC? A 2026 Guide to the GIAC Exam
With GSEC, the real question is who pays: $999 for an attempt, $8,780 with SEC401. Who it suits, the 72% pass mark,...
CISA in 2026: Why the Exam Wants the Auditor’s Answer
CISA rewards the auditor's answer, not the engineer's. Who hires CISAs, the exam format, the five-year experience rule, member and non-member fees,...
SC-200 in 2026: Learn KQL First, Then Book the Exam
SC-200 is still active, with an update on October 21. Why KQL comes first, who it fits, the three skill areas, the...
Friday’s brief: TeamCity ransomware, then Roundcube, cPanel, GitLab
The fastest way to catch up on what changed after this article was published.
Start your morning with the signal that matters.
Get the biggest cybersecurity developments, why they matter, and where to go deeper on CyberExperts.
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Free. Weekdays. Built for operators.