What Cybersecurity Needs to Add After Zero Trust

By John King, CISSP, PMP, CISM   Published: 03/28/25   Updated: 10/23/26   3 min read

Zero Trust remains one of the most useful security models of the last decade, but it is not the endpoint. Organizations now have to think beyond identity checks alone, toward resilience, cloud sprawl and third-party exposure, plus attack paths that cut across users, workloads and APIs.

The next phase of cybersecurity builds on Zero Trust instead of abandoning it. Strong programs pair identity discipline with better telemetry and faster response. They plan for recovery, too.

Where zero trust stands

Zero trust is a strong starting point, not the finish line. This piece looks at what comes next and the technologies pushing security past it.

Zero Trust: Origins and Legacy

Zero trust changed security with one rule: “never trust, always verify.” It removed the assumption that anything inside the network is safe and made identity checks the center of access decisions. That set a new baseline. It also left room for other controls to build on it.

Critical Shortcomings

Zero trust has limits. Constant identity checks can slow people down and create operational friction. And as attacks get more sophisticated, a narrow focus on identity can miss other attack surfaces, such as exposed APIs or supplier access.

Emerging Technologies and Trends

Gartner’s Emerging Tech Impact Radar points to several technologies that could matter beyond zero trust. Two stand out here: Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) and the pairing of artificial intelligence (AI) with machine learning (ML).

SASE: An Integrated Approach

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) combines networking and security functions into one cloud-delivered service. Organizations can protect remote users and branch offices without routing all traffic back through a data center, which helps performance. Many security teams now treat it as a core part of their plans.

AI and ML: Faster Defense

AI and ML can automate threat detection and speed up response. Used well, they spot patterns humans miss and cut the time between an alert and action.

Building for resilience

Resilience is the ability to withstand attacks and recover from them. It assumes something will get through. Building it takes continuous monitoring and fast response, wired into the defense architecture instead of added later.

What practitioners recommend

Security practitioners increasingly pair resilience with zero trust. Common advice includes real-time monitoring and steady investment in training security staff, which improves response and the overall security posture.

What to watch

Zero trust is not going away. Watch how SASE adoption grows and how AI tools prove themselves in real security operations. And watch whether organizations measure recovery time as seriously as prevention.

Stay Current

Newer CyberExperts coverage on this topic

This article still works as background. If you want the current picture, start with the freshest related coverage below and today's brief.

Latest Daily Brief

Friday’s brief: GitLab’s 10.0 fix, then VeloCloud attacks, a poisoned LiteLLM release and PHP2Shell logs to check

The fastest way to catch up on what changed after this article was published.

Read Today's Brief

John King, CISSP, PMP, CISM

John King currently works in the greater Los Angeles area as a ISSO (Information Systems Security Officer). John has a passion for learning and developing his cyber security skills through education, hands on work, and studying for IT certifications.